ElectionsInfo.net     An Internet archive of election results and analysis

ElectionsInfo

United States

International

Search

   Supreme Court to Decide Mandatory ID Case

NEWS INFORMATION

Parent

Parent

News Date

3/22/2004 12:00 am

Author

Media

Associated Press

Category

News

Database Record

Entered 3/22/2004, Updated 3/22/2004

Original Article

Link

Description

Supreme Court to Decide Mandatory ID Case The Honolulu Advertiser Do you have to tell the police your name? Depending on how the Supreme Court rules, the answer could be the difference between arrest and freedom. The justices heard arguments Monday in a first-of-its kind case that asks whether people can be punished for refusing to identify themselves. The case will clarify police powers in the post-Sept. 11 era, determining if officials can demand to see identification whenever they deem it necessary. Nevada senior deputy attorney general Conrad Hafen told justices that "identifying yourself is a neutral act" that helps police in their investigations and doesn't, by itself, incriminate anyone. At the heart of the case is an intersection of the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from unreasonable searches, and the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. But if that is allowed, several justices asked, what will be next? A fingerprint? Telephone number? E-mail address? What about a national identification card? "The government could require name tags, color codes," Hiibel's lawyer, Robert Dolan, told the court.


NEWS OF NEWS

Date

Category

Headline


DISCUSSION

All information on this site is © ElectionsInfo.net and should not be used without attribution.