July 24, 2024
Secretary Antony J. Blinken And NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg At a Joint Press Availability
Secretary Antony J. Blinken And NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg At a Joint Press AvailabilitySECRETARY BLINKEN:  Good afternoon, everyone.  It is as always a great pleasure to welcome the secretary general back to Washington, back to the State Department.  Jens, so good to be with you. Before I begin and with your permission, I just want to briefly update everyone on our efforts to assist Türkiye and Syria in...

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Good afternoon, everyone.  It is as always a great pleasure to welcome the secretary general back to Washington, back to the State Department.  Jens, so good to be with you.

Before I begin and with your permission, I just want to briefly update everyone on our efforts to assist Türkiye and Syria in the aftermath of Monday’s earthquakes.  The loss of life has been truly staggering, shocking.  We, I think along with people around the world, are mourning those who have been lost, and also our thoughts are so with those who have lost loved ones.

So far, we have deployed more than 150 search and rescue personnel to Türkiye.  We have U.S. helicopters that are helping to reach areas that would otherwise be difficult to access.  In Syria, we have NGO partners that we’ve funded over the years that are providing life-saving assistance to those in need.  Across both countries, we’ve deployed experienced emergency managers, hazardous materials technicians, engineers, logisticians, paramedics, planners, others, along with about 170,000 pounds of specialized tools and equipment.

So, that’s been the initial response.  In the days ahead, we’ll have more to say about how we’ll continue to support both the Turkish and Syrian people as they work to recover from this devastation.

Turning back to today, the secretary general and I were last together in November for the NATO foreign ministers meeting.  The members of our Alliance left that meeting in Bucharest even more unified, more resolute and more committed in our support for Ukraine; which is in large part due to the remarkable leadership that Secretary General Stoltenberg has engaged in over the last year.  During what has been a decisive time for NATO and for the world, his strong and steady hand has helped steer our Alliance in the right direction.

Now, as we approach the one-year mark since President Putin launched his brutal war against Ukraine, it’s critical that we maintain and increase that support.  President Putin’s war continues to be a strategic failure.  He’s failed to overthrow the democratically elected government of Ukraine, to subsume Ukraine into Russia, or to break the will of its people.  He’s lost the battles for Kyiv, for Kharkiv, for Kherson.  His military is suffering staggering losses on the battlefield, and he’s failed to weaken our Alliance and what it stands for.  In fact, that alliance – NATO – is stronger and more united than it’s ever been.

Today, we focused on steps that we can take to ensure that Ukraine has the security assistance that it needs to defend its territory against Russian aggression.  And we’ll continue that conversation this afternoon when we’re joined by the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, and the National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, here at the State Department.

We’ve calibrated our assistance to meet Ukraine’s changing needs from the outset of the Russian invasion, and that’s exactly what we’ll continue to do.  Two weeks ago, President Biden announced that the United States would send Abrams tanks to Ukraine.  Germany committed to send its Leopard tanks and authorized other partners to do the same.  This followed the earlier announcement by the United Kingdom that it would be sending Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine’s defenders.

Last week, we also announced two new assistance packages which will provide critical air defense and counter-drone capabilities to help Ukraine defend its people, including against the threat posed by UAVs supplied by Iran, which shares Russia’s authoritarian vision and is increasingly aiding and abetting its aggression.  We’re also providing armored infantry vehicles and more of the equipment that Ukraine is using so effectively, like Javelin anti-tank missiles, artillery ammunition, and rockets for U.S.-provided HIMARS.

In total, the United States has committed nearly $30 billion since the beginning of Russia’s invasion.  And our allies and partners have provided more than $13 billion in military assistance over the past year and tens of billions more in humanitarian and economic support.  The contributions that Europe writ large has made to this effort are very significant, and making a profound difference.

As President Zelenskyy has said, diplomacy is the only way to definitively end Russia’s war of aggression and to create a path to peace that is both just and durable.  Clearly, President Putin has no genuine interest in diplomacy right now.  Here’s what he said just a few weeks ago:  Unless and until Ukraine accepts “the new territorial realities” – in quotation marks – there is nothing to even talk about.  In other words, Ukraine and the world must somehow acquiesce to President Putin’s land grab.  That should be a non-starter for every country in the world that cares about the UN charter, and preserving international peace and security.

The best way to hasten prospects for real diplomacy is to keep tilting the battlefield in Ukraine’s favor.  This will help ensure that Ukraine has the strongest possible hand to play at a negotiating table when one emerges.

We also discussed the systemic and tactical challenges that China presents to the Alliance and the broader international system.  Last week, Beijing violated international law and U.S. sovereignty with the presence of a Chinese surveillance balloon in U.S. airspace.  This was an irresponsible act, in response to which we acted responsibly and prudently to protect our interests.

There is an ongoing operation to recover the balloon’s components.  We’re analyzing them to learn more about the surveillance program.  We will pair that with what we learn from the balloon – what we learn from the balloon itself with what we’ve gleaned based on our careful observation of the system when it was in our airspace, as the President directed his team to do.

We’ll also share relevant findings with Congress as well as with our allies and partners around the world.  Senior administration officials are on the Hill this week, and we’ve already shared information with dozens of countries around the world both from Washington and through our embassies.  We’re doing so because the United States was not the only target of this broader program which has violated the sovereignty of countries across five continents.  In our engagements, we are again hearing from our partners that the world expects China and the United States to manage our relationship responsibly.  That’s precisely what we’ve set out to do.  We continue to urge China to do the same.

We’re also continuing to strengthen and broaden NATO’s partnerships, and weave them together in new ways.  The United States welcomed the Secretary General’s visit to South Korea and Japan last week as an extension of those efforts, demonstrating the growing synergy between our Atlantic and Pacific alliances.  And of course, we’re very focused on the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO.  These countries are ready to bring their strengths to bear on our Alliance.  They’re capable, they’re trusted partners, they’re strong democracies that are dedicated to the values that underpin the Alliance.  We’ll continue to push for the completion of this process as we head towards the Vilnius Summit in July.

And as we look to Vilnius, our Alliance is working to operationalize the strategic concept to make sure that NATO is fit for the future, including on challenges like emerging technologies, cyber defense, climate, and energy security.  These were all significant achievements under the leadership of Secretary General Stoltenberg in bringing forward and having approved a new strategic concept for the Alliance to reflect the realities of the moment we’re living in and to project what we need to do into the future.

So, it’s a busy time, but we’re confident about what our Alliance could achieve – confident because of the great unity that we’ve shown again and again over the last year, and confident because of the shared purpose we bring to the year and the years ahead.

With that, Jens, over to you.

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG:  Secretary Blinken, dear Tony, it’s great to be back in Washington and to be together with you again.  I would like to start by commending President Biden and the United States for providing such a strong leadership at a time when we face the most serious security crisis in a generation.  And thank you, Tony, for your personal commitment and your leadership on every issue related to NATO and the vital bond between America and Europe.  Unwavering American leadership and bipartisan support have ensured that NATO Allies are united like never before.  And our unity makes a real difference.

President Putin launched his illegal war of aggression almost a year ago.  Since then, NATO Allies have provided unprecedented support for Ukraine – around $120 billion in military, humanitarian and financial assistance.  As the biggest Ally, the United States is playing an indispensable role in supporting Ukraine.  European NATO Allies and Canada have stepped up as well, contributing over half of the overall assistance, including tanks, advanced air defense systems, and other military equipment.  Europeans have also welcomed almost 5 million refugees from Ukraine, applied unprecedented sanctions, and decoupled from Russian gas and Russian oil.  This shows how much we can do when Europe and North American stand together.

Today, we discussed the situation in Ukraine.  Putin started this war of aggression, and he can end this war today by withdrawing his troops from Ukraine and coming to the negotiating table.  But regrettably, we see no sign that Russia is preparing for peace.  On the contrary, Moscow is preparing for new military offensives, so we must continue to provide Ukraine with the weapons it needs to retake territory and prevail as a sovereign, independent nation.

If Putin wins, it will be a tragedy for Ukraine, but it will also be dangerous for all of us.  It will send a clear message not just to Putin but also to other authoritarian regimes that when they use force, they can achieve their goals.  That will make the world more dangerous, and all of us more vulnerable.

Beijing is watching closely and learning lessons that may influence its future decisions.  So, what happens in Europe today could happen in Asia tomorrow.  China is substantially building up its military forces, including nuclear weapons without any transparency.  It is attempting to assert control over the South China Sea and threatening Taiwan, trying to take control of critical infrastructure, including in NATO countries, repressing its own citizens and tramping on human rights, and deepening its strategic partnership with Moscow.  So, NATO Allies had real concerns which we discussed today.

In this more dangerous and more competitive world, we must continue to strengthen our deterrence and defense, and further increase defense spending; and that is what we are doing.  In 2014, under the Obama-Biden administration, all NATO Allies agreed the Defense Investment Pledge.  Since then, we have seen eight consecutive years of increased defense spending across Europe and Canada – with an additional 350 million extra U.S. dollars spent. [1]  More countries are now spending at least 2 percent of GDP on defense, and I expect that trend to continue.

Today, we also discussed the importance of completing Finland and Sweden’s accession to NATO.  At the Madrid Summit, last July, all Allies made the historic decision to invite both countries to join NATO.  All Allies have signed the accession protocols, and 28 Allies have already ratified the agreement.  Finland and Sweden are now being integrated into the civilian and military structures of our Alliance.  This has only strengthened their security, and it is inconceivable that Allies would not act should Finland or Sweden come under pressure.  It is important that we conclude this membership process as soon as possible.  This will strengthen the security of all Allies.

So Secretary Blinken, dear Tony, thank you again for your strong personal commitment and for the extraordinary leadership of the United States as we face global challenges together.  Thank you.

MR PRICE:  We’ll now turn to questions.  We will start with Leon Bruneau of the AFP.

QUESTION:  Hi there, Mr. Secretary and Secretary General.  Thanks for doing this.  Mr. Secretary, you started the press conference speaking about the tragic earthquake in Türkiye and Syria, and actually that’s – my question is relevant to that.  Specifically, as you know, there’s – in one border crossing in the northwest of Syria, which is damaged by the earthquake and there are no other crossings, and so obviously it’s going to be difficult to get the aid there.  And you also said that – you were adamant in saying that all U.S. aid would go through local NGOs, U.S.-funded local NGOs.

And so, my question is this, is I was wondering if the administration has had any contact at any level with the Syrian Government?  And if there were a request through the Syrian Government, would the U.S., the administration, accede to that request to coordinate aid for the Syrian people?

And a question for the secretary general.  Since Türkiye is obviously a NATO member, could you provide us some detail on what NATO is actually doing to help the recovery efforts in Türkiye?  And also, tragically, would this tragedy in any way help to ease tensions with Türkiye on relevant issues that you mentioned on your agenda?  Thank you very much.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Leon, thank you very much.  With regard to Syria, I’m not aware of any contacts between the United States Government and the Syrian Government in recent days since the earthquake.  But here’s what we’ve been doing.  If you go back to 2011, we provided more than $15 billion in assistance to the Syrian people through NGO partners – international NGO partners, partners on the ground in Syria.  We’re a leading provider of humanitarian assistance to Syria, to the Syrian people, not to the government.  And working through these partners, we’ve tried to make sure that the assistance gets to where it’s needed, and that’s the people who are affected by the horrific war that Assad has waged on his own people, since 2011 – and now, in the case of the earthquake, to people affected by the earthquake.

You’re exactly right that there is one crossing that allows assistance to get into Syria from the outside, and that was disrupted by the earthquake.  It’s exactly why we have been fighting every single year not only to preserve that crossing at the – it’s authorized, as you know, by the United Nations – but to get additional ones so that if a crossing was taken out of action, there would be other places that people could get humanitarian assistance in.  And of course, year after year, Russia has sought to block those crossings or to limit them, and that only compounds the tragedy that people in Syria are now experiencing.

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG:  Just a couple of hours after the earthquake, we sent out a call from the NATO headquarters to all NATO Allies to provide immediate support, to help Türkiye with the consequence of a devastating earthquake.  And I welcome that Allies have stepped up and are now providing different types of support.  Of course, the U.S., Secretary Blinken mentioned, has already provided lot of support, but also other Allies are stepping up.  And that’s the continued message from NATO, is that we should support Türkiye, a valued and important NATO Ally, where we see human suffering and the devastating consequences of the earthquake.

And of course, Allies have also expressed their deepest condolences, and it is heartbreaking to see all the suffering, but also to see how people and Allies are now stepping up to provide as much help as possible.

MR PRICE:  Tove Bjørgaas, NRK.

QUESTION:  Question for Secretary Blinken.  How important is it for the Biden administration that Sweden is also allowed to join NATO, not just Finland?  And what is the U.S. doing to solve this argument with Erdogan and Türkiye?  What – how can the U.S. influence that Türkiye changes its position?

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Thank you.  Well, first, this is not a bilateral issue between the United States and any other country.  This is an Alliance matter, and our view is very clear:  Both Finland and Sweden are ready to be NATO Allies, and the Alliance should welcome them as quickly as possible.  Their militaries already work seamlessly with Alliance forces.  As I said earlier, they’re strong, vibrant democracies.  We’re confident that NATO will formally welcome both countries, and that that will happen soon – and this will in turn enhance security across the entire Euro-Atlantic region.

As this process continues, we are fully committed to Finland and Sweden’s accession to the Alliance.  And again, I think you can see the strength of that support across the Alliance.  Nearly all countries took swift action.  Our Senate overwhelmingly, and on a bipartisan basis, voted for their membership, and the time is right now to finalize that accession process and to welcome as full members of NATO.

We support the work that both countries have been doing with Türkiye to address legitimate concerns that Türkiye has brought to the table about its security.  There’s an ongoing process there, but – as you know, both countries, Finland and Sweden, took significant steps to address concerns that Türkiye raised.  They made commitments under a memorandum of agreement that was signed in Madrid, and they are making good on the commitments that they’ve made.  Again, we acknowledge Türkiye’s longtime security concerns.  We appreciate the tangible actions that both countries, Finland and Sweden, have taken to address them.

MR PRICE:  Nick Schifrin of PBS.

QUESTION:  Thank you very much.  Mr. Secretary, forgive me, two questions for you, and then I’ll turn to the secretary general.

Today the British prime minister announced that the UK would provide fighter jet training, Western fighter jet training, to Ukrainian pilots and would examine the possibility of providing Western jets to Ukraine.  Why does the U.S. continue to oppose a step that the British Government now believes would be helpful to Ukraine long-term?

And on the balloon, you’ve described now the network of aerial surveillance conducted by China in five continents.  Do you believe that that network is run by the PLA air force, and do you believe Xi Jinping himself was aware of the balloon last week?

And Mr. Secretary General, U.S. officials have described that Chinese surveillance balloons have flown over at least one European country.  Is that something that NATO is aware of and are you concerned about?  Thank you.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Thanks, Nick, very much.  So first of all, with regard to the balloon, we will have more to say about that in the days ahead.  We are getting more information almost by the hour as we continue to work to salvage the balloon.  We’re learning from that, and, as well, we’re learning from what we saw and picked up as the balloon traversed the United States.

As to who’s responsible for that, China is, and it doesn’t matter on one level which individuals may or may not have been responsible.  The fact is China engaged in this irresponsible action, a violation of our sovereignty and territorial integrity and international law.  And as we’ve noted as well, we’re not alone in this.  Countries across five continents have also had surveillance balloons overfly their territory, which is why we’re sharing this information with others.  We continue to look to China to act responsibly; and as well to help us in managing this relationship responsibly.  That’s what we continue to look for.

And I’m sorry, the first part of your question —

QUESTION:  Fighter jets.

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Oh, the fighter jets.  As we’ve said throughout this process, at every single turn, we will – working very closely with the Ukrainians as well as working with other partners and allies – work to make sure that Ukraine has what it needs when it needs it to effectively defend itself and to continue to take back the territory that’s been seized from it by Russian forces.  As the nature of the conflict, of the aggression has evolved, so too has the support that we’ve provided.

And what we did initially – in fact, before the Russian aggression itself, as we saw it coming and wanted to make sure that Ukraine had in its hands what it would need to defend itself – we did these very significant drawdowns a year – more – well more than a year – a year and a half ago, back in September before the aggression – Christmas before the aggression.  And as a result, they had things like Stingers and Javelins on hand when Russia went at Kyiv, and they were able to repel the attack and push it back.  At every step along the way, as needs have evolved, so too has what we have provided Ukraine; and that most recently took place with the decision to provide the Abrams tanks and – of course, Germany providing the Leopard tanks and other Europeans doing the same.

We’ve also been very clear all along that what’s vital is not just a particular weapon system or piece of equipment.  Equally important is the ability of Ukrainians to use it effectively, and that requires in some cases significant training.  Equally important is the ability to maintain it.  And then finally all of that has to be brought together in an actually – in a coherent strategy.  All of those elements are important.

It’s a long way of saying this is an evolving process, and we will continue to make judgments about what we think Ukraine needs and what it can be most effective in using.  We’ll do that in very close consultation with the Ukrainians and, of course, in consultation with our partners.

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG:  The Chinese balloon over United States confirms a pattern of Chinese behavior, where we see that China over the last years has invested heavily in new military capabilities, including different types of surveillance and intelligence platforms.  And we’ve also seen increased Chinese intelligence activities in Europe – again, different platforms.  They use satellites, they use cyber, and as we’ve seen over the United States, also balloons.

So, we just have to be vigilant.  We need to be aware of the constant risk of Chinese intelligence, and then step up what we do to protect ourself.  And we need also to react in a prudent, responsible, and vigilant way, as we have seen the United States has reacted to this specific balloon over North America and United States.

I think it also highlights that security is not regional; security is global.  What happens in Asia matters for Europe, and what happens in Europe matters for Asia and also, of course, for North America.  This was a message that was very much confirmed during my visit to Japan and South Korea – East Asia – last week, where those close partners of NATO very much highlighted the importance of strengthening the cooperation between NATO and our partners in the Indo-Pacific to address the challenges that China poses to our security, to our values, and to our interests.  And I think that is – the balloon over North America just confirms that pattern.

MR PRICE:  We’ll take a final question from Karin Eriksson of ND.[1]

QUESTION:  Thank you very much.  So back to Türkiye, then, because Türkiye is now sending the signal that it might accept Finland but not Sweden into NATO, separating the processes.  I wanted to ask you both:  To what extent do you see this as a possible or viable path forward? Thank you.

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG:  First of all, I think we have to remember that all Allies, also Türkiye, made an historic decision in July last year when all Allies at the NATO summit in Madrid invited both Finland and Sweden to become members of the Alliance.  Then all Allies – all 30 Allies – signed the Accession Protocols.  And so far – already, 28 out of 30 Allies have ratified the Accession Protocols.

These are historic decisions.  And so far, this has been one of the quickest accessions processes in NATO’s history and the quickest in NATO’s modern history, because we have to remember that Finland and Sweden applied in May last year, and only in July they were invited, and now 28 out of 30 have ratified the protocols.  They applied together, they were invited together, and 28 Allies have already signed both protocols.

I think it’s important that we recognize the importance both for Finland and Sweden, but also for the whole Alliance, that they become a member – that they will become members as quickly as possible.  As part of the decision in Madrid, Finland, Sweden, and Türkiye signed a joint memorandum on how to step up cooperation – not least in the fight against terrorism.  Finland and Sweden have delivered on their commitments under that memorandum.  I also expressed that view in my meetings with the Turkish leadership.  So, I’m confident that both will become a member, but I’m not ready to go into exactly when that will happen.


MR PRICE:  Thank you, gentlemen.



[1]Correction: An additional $350 billion since 2014

Official news published at https://www.state.gov/secretary-antony-j-blinken-and-nato-secretary-general-jens-stoltenberg-at-a-joint-press-availability-2/

originally published at Politics - Social Gov